1. What is the purpose of the WECC Approved Dynamic Model Library?

It provides a standardized set of WECC-approved dynamic models for system planning and operational studies, ensuring consistency, interoperability, and grid reliability across the Western Interconnection.

2. Which generator model replaces GENTPJ?

The GENQEC model (approved December 2020) replaces GENTPJ. WECC will not accept GENTPJ models after December 31, 2024.

3. Are older wind models (WT3G, WT4G, WT3E, WT4E) still valid?

No. These wind models were retired in April 2020. Developers must use updated combinations such as REGC_A/B + REEC_A/C/D + REPC_A–D.

4. What’s new in renewable energy modeling for 2024?

REGFM_A1 (grid-forming inverter model, approved Sept 2023). REPC_D (advanced plant controller, approved Jan 2024).

5. Do excitation system models follow IEEE standards?

Yes, most approved models (e.g., AC1A, AC2A, AC4A) align with IEEE 2005 standards. Some legacy WECC-specific variants differ slightly.

6. Which governor models are approved for frequency response studies?

Recommended models include GGOV1, GGOV1D, IEEEG1D, HYGOVD, and TGOV1D, all of which support fast frequency response (FFR).

7. What load models should be used for DER-heavy systems?

Use the CMPLDWG model (Composite Load with Distributed Generation), approved in 2019, for DER-rich system simulations.

8. Are manual excitation models allowed?

No. MEXS and other simplified manual excitation models are no longer approved.

9. What happens if I use a retired model in my study?

Studies using retired models may be rejected by WECC, requiring resubmission with approved equivalents — leading to delays and additional costs.

10. How do plant controller models differ (REPC_A vs REPC_B/C/D)?

REPC_A: Single renewable plant. REPC_B: Multi-device control. REPC_C: Single aggregated WTG. REPC_D (2024): Advanced multi-device flexibility and streamlined functions.

11. What relay models are required for ride-through compliance?

LHFRT (frequency ride-through) and LHVRT (voltage ride-through) models are mandatory for NERC PRC-024 compliance.

12. How are PSLF models converted to PSS®E?

Conversions are done via PTI’s official program. Some models (e.g., TEXS, STCON) are not directly converted and must be replaced with approved equivalents.

13. Is GENROU still valid?

GENROU remains valid but is being transitioned to GENQEC, which is now the WECC standard.

14. What about proprietary wind models (Vestas GENWRI, GEWTG)?

Proprietary vendor models are not approved. Developers must transition to generic WECC-approved renewable models.

15. How does WECC handle distributed energy resource (DER) modeling?

By requiring DER_A (2018) and CMPLDWG for composite loads with distributed generation.

16. What’s the difference between REGC_A and REGC_B?

Both are inverter/converter models, but REGC_B (2020) includes enhancements for improved IBR behavior.

17. Which excitation systems include OEL/UEL inputs?

IEEE 2005-compliant systems such as ESAC1A, ESAC2A, ESAC3A, and ESAC6A include OEL/UEL inputs.

18. Are plant-wide VAR controls modeled?

Yes, through REPC_A–D models, which handle plant-level reactive power and voltage control.

19. What’s the latest development in HVDC modeling?

CHVDC2 (2017) and VHVDC1 (2021) are approved for two-terminal HVDC systems.

20. Who needs to comply with WECC dynamic model requirements?

All entities submitting cases to WECC — including utilities, renewable developers, consultants, and asset owners — must comply.

Why Dynamic Models Matter for Grid Reliability

A Coordinated Electric System Interconnection Review—the utility’s deep-dive on technical and cost impacts of your project.

Challenge: Frequent false tripping using conventional electromechanical relays
Solution: SEL-487E integration with multi-terminal differential protection and dynamic inrush restraint
Result: 90% reduction in false trips, saving over $250,000 in downtime

Dynamic models are the foundation of modern power system studies, enabling engineers to simulate, predict, and secure grid operations under increasingly complex conditions. As renewable penetration increases and the grid evolves with inverter-based resources (IBRs), validated and up-to-date dynamic models become essential for stability and compliance. Recent work in inverter-based loads modeling (latest research 2024–2025) highlights new aggregate load representations and control interactions that materially affect study outcomes. Keentel Engineering offers compliance and modeling support to translate these research advances into reliable, auditable models for planning and operations.

The WECC Approved Dynamic Model Library (January 2024) provides the most recent, rigorously tested set of models that utilities, developers, and independent power producers are required to use in planning, operational, and compliance studies.

In this blog, we break down the latest approved models, outline key retirements and transitions, and explain what engineers, developers, and asset owners need to know to remain compliant and ahead of regulatory expectations.

The Western Electricity Coordinating Council (WECC) dynamic models play a critical role in representing system behavior during both transient and steady-state events. These standardized models ensure consistency across utilities and system operators throughout the Western Interconnection. The WECC approved dynamic models library now incorporates recent inverter-based load templates and grid-forming inverter behavior, reducing cross-tool discrepancies. Keentel’s teams map WECC model updates into engineering workflows to improve study reproducibility and regulatory readiness.

Purpose: WECC maintains a well-defined library of dynamic simulation models that represent how power equipment and control systems respond under different operating conditions.
Scope: The models cover a wide range of components, including excitation systems, generators, power system stabilizers (PSS), load models, turbine/governor systems, renewable energy system models, and protective relays. This enables engineers to study stability, reliability, and grid performance with greater accuracy.
Software Platforms: To ensure interoperability, WECC dynamic models are available for leading simulation tools such as GE PSLF, PTI PSS®E, and PowerWorld Simulator, and they align with IEEE dynamic model standards.

Exciters play a critical role in generator voltage regulation and reactive power control. According to page 1 of the WECC-approved PDF, the organization maintains a detailed list of excitation system models that are valid for planning and compliance studies.

Key Updates

Standardization: Many exciter models have been harmonized with IEEE 2005 standards (e.g., AC1A, AC2A, AC3A).
Obsolete/Not Approved: Older models such as EXAC3 and MEXS (manual excitation) are no longer approved.
Modern Use: Models like ESST7B and ST6C include advanced limiters and PI voltage controllers, aligning with modern exciter technologies.

Keentel Engineering Takeaway

Always verify exciter models in your PSLF/PSS®E submissions. Using outdated exciter definitions may lead to model validation issues or study rejection.

Explore our Power System Studies page to see how our engineers ensure accurate modeling and compliance in grid studies.

On page 2 of the WECC PDF, a significant update is outlined for generator modeling standards:

GENROU (round rotor model) and GENTPJ (transient model) are being phased out.
GENQEC (approved in December 2020) is now the standard generator model.
WECC retirement deadline: The GENTPJ model will no longer be accepted after December 31, 2024.

Keentel Engineering Takeaway
GENROU and GENTPJ are being phased out in favor of GENQEC as the standard generator model. All projects must transition to GENQEC models moving forward to ensure compatibility with current dynamic libraries and validation tools. GENQEC adoption also simplifies integrated studies where advanced inverter and load models are included, supporting broader grid reliability modeling and ERCOT dynamic modeling needs. Keentel Engineering compliance and modeling support helps asset owners implement GENQEC and verify interactions with modern IBR and load representations.

Power System Stabilizer (PSS) models are critical in damping power system oscillations and improving small-signal stability.

Highlights

Approved Multi-Band Models: PSS4B and PSS4C (ABB designs).
Generic Standards: PSS2A, PSS2C, PSS3B remain widely used in power system studies.
Retired/Not Approved: Proprietary stabilizers like PSSSH (Siemens H∞) are not approved.
Practical Note: Multi-band stabilizers are recommended for wide-area oscillation damping, especially in renewable-rich grids where stability challenges are increasing.

Composite load modeling has become increasingly important as distribution-connected resources continue to reshape system load behavior.

CMPLDW (Composite Load Model): Approved since 2013, this model represents load behavior with a combination of static, dynamic, and distributed equivalent components.
CMPLDWG (Composite Load with DG): Approved in 2019, this enhanced model explicitly incorporates distributed generation (DG), improving the accuracy of simulations involving inverter-based resources.
Motor Models: The MOTOR1 and MOTORW models remain valid and widely used for representing industrial and utility motor-driven loads.
Industry Trend: Regulators and reliability coordinators are moving toward tighter compliance requirements for modeling Distributed Energy Resources (DERs), ensuring that their effects on stability and reliability are fully captured.

The most significant changes in renewable energy dynamic modeling (page 3–4 of the PDF) highlight the shift toward more advanced inverter-based resource (IBR) models.

Approved Models

REGC_A / REGC_B – inverter/converter models for grid interaction.
REEC_A, REEC_C, REEC_D – renewable electrical control models.
REPC_A / REPC_B / REPC_C / REPC_D (2024) – plant controller models for solar PV, wind power, and energy storage integration.
REGFM_A1 (Sept 2023) – droop-controlled, grid-forming inverter model, essential for IBR stability and NERC compliance.

Retired Models (April 2020)

WT3G, WT4G, WT3E, WT4E – generic wind turbine models no longer accepted.
WT3P, WT4T, WT2P – turbine/pitch models phased out.

Practical Implication
All renewable energy developers must migrate to Phase 2 WECC-approved models (REGC, REEC, REPC families). Failure to adopt these models can result in project study delays, compliance issues, or outright rejections by WECC and NERC reviewers.

Page 5 of the PDF highlights approved protection relay models for compliance studies:

Approved Models: LHFRT/LHVRT (low/high frequency ride-through), LOCTI (branch overcurrent), OOSLEN (out-of-step relay), and TIOC relay models.
Retired Model: SVCWSC (Static Var Compensator, retired in 2012).
New Approvals (2020): SCL1C, SCL2C, PF1/PF2, VAR1/VAR2.

Keentel Engineering Note
Grid codes require validated relay models for inverter-based resources (IBRs). Missing or outdated models may impact NERC PRC-024 and PRC-026 compliance studies.

NERC & WECC Compliance Deadlines: Transition away from retired dynamic models (e.g., GENTPJ, WT3/4 series) before 2025 to remain fully compliant.
IBR Model Integration: Adopt grid-forming inverter models (REGFM_A1) and advanced plant controller models (REPC_D) for reliable IBR compliance.
Software Consistency in PSLF/PSS®E: Validate model conversions across platforms, as discrepancies can lead to simulation errors and compliance issues.
Future Outlook: Expect WECC to expand modeling requirements for Distributed Energy Resources (DERs), especially at the distribution level.

The January 2024 WECC Approved Dynamic Model Library highlights the rapid pace of grid transformation. With synchronous machines retiring, inverter-based resources (IBRs) now dominating, and NERC/WECC compliance requirements tightening, accurate power system modeling is no longer optional—it’s essential for long-term grid reliability.

Keentel Engineering supports utilities, developers, and asset owners in navigating these updates—covering everything from dynamic model selection, validation studies, and power system analysis to full NERC compliance documentation.

1. What is the purpose of the WECC Approved Dynamic Model Library?
It provides a standardized set of WECC-approved dynamic models for system planning and operational studies, ensuring consistency, interoperability, and grid reliability across the Western Interconnection.
2. Which generator model replaces GENTPJ?
The GENQEC model (approved December 2020) replaces GENTPJ. WECC will not accept GENTPJ models after December 31, 2024.
3. Are older wind models (WT3G, WT4G, WT3E, WT4E) still valid?
No. These wind models were retired in April 2020. Developers must use updated combinations such as REGC_A/B + REEC_A/C/D + REPC_A–D.
4. What’s new in renewable energy modeling for 2024?
REGFM_A1 (grid-forming inverter model, approved Sept 2023).
REPC_D (advanced plant controller, approved Jan 2024).
5. Do excitation system models follow IEEE standards?
Yes, most approved models (e.g., AC1A, AC2A, AC4A) align with IEEE 2005 standards. Some legacy WECC-specific variants differ slightly.
6. Which governor models are approved for frequency response studies?
Recommended models include GGOV1, GGOV1D, IEEEG1D, HYGOVD, and TGOV1D, all of which support fast frequency response (FFR).
7. What load models should be used for DER-heavy systems?
Use the CMPLDWG model (Composite Load with Distributed Generation), approved in 2019, for DER-rich system simulations.
8. Are manual excitation models allowed?
No. MEXS and other simplified manual excitation models are no longer approved.
9. What happens if I use a retired model in my study?
Studies using retired models may be rejected by WECC, requiring resubmission with approved equivalents — leading to delays and additional costs.
10. How do plant controller models differ (REPC_A vs REPC_B/C/D)?
REPC_A: Single renewable plant.
REPC_B: Multi-device control.
REPC_C: Single aggregated WTG.
REPC_D (2024): Advanced multi-device flexibility and streamlined functions.
11. What relay models are required for ride-through compliance?
LHFRT (frequency ride-through) and LHVRT (voltage ride-through) models are mandatory for NERC PRC-024 compliance.
12. How are PSLF models converted to PSS®E?
Conversions are done via PTI’s official program. Some models (e.g., TEXS, STCON) are not directly converted and must be replaced with approved equivalents.
13. Is GENROU still valid?
GENROU remains valid but is being transitioned to GENQEC, which is now the WECC standard.
14. What about proprietary wind models (Vestas GENWRI, GEWTG)?
Proprietary vendor models are not approved. Developers must transition to generic WECC-approved renewable models.
15. How does WECC handle distributed energy resource (DER) modeling?
By requiring DER_A (2018) and CMPLDWG for composite loads with distributed generation.
16. What’s the difference between REGC_A and REGC_B?
Both are inverter/converter models, but REGC_B (2020) includes enhancements for improved IBR behavior.
17. Which excitation systems include OEL/UEL inputs?
IEEE 2005-compliant systems such as ESAC1A, ESAC2A, ESAC3A, and ESAC6A include OEL/UEL inputs.
18. Are plant-wide VAR controls modeled?
Yes, through REPC_A–D models, which handle plant-level reactive power and voltage control.
19. What’s the latest development in HVDC modeling?
CHVDC2 (2017) and VHVDC1 (2021) are approved for two-terminal HVDC systems.
20. Who needs to comply with WECC dynamic model requirements?
All entities submitting cases to WECC — including utilities, renewable developers, consultants, and asset owners — must comply.

In 1995, Sandip (Sonny) R. Patel earned his Electrical Engineering degree from the University of Illinois, specializing in Electrical Engineering . But degrees don’t build legacies—action does. For three decades, he’s been shaping the future of engineering, not just as a licensed Professional Engineer across multiple states (Florida, California, New York, West Virginia, and Minnesota), but as a doer. A builder. A leader. Not just an engineer. A Licensed Electrical Contractor in Florida with an Unlimited EC license. Not just an executive. The founder and CEO of KEENTEL LLC—where expertise meets execution. Three decades. Multiple states. Endless impact.